MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,854 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,854 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 38

Labels cover 5 of 1,854 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,854 of 1,854 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Ancestral genome duplication in rice
Romain Guyot, Beat Keller
2004· article· en· Genome· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
176
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Is homoploid hybrid speciation that rare? An empiricist’s view
Gonzalo Nieto Feliner, Inés Álvarez, Myriam Heuertz, Isabel Marques, F Moharrek, Rosalía Piñeiro +4 more
2017· article· en· Heredity· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
170
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Endogenous retroviruses
Irina A. Maksakova, Dixie L. Mager, Daphné Reiss
2008· review· en· Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
168
citations
affunlabeled
Recombination between heterologous human acrocentric chromosomes
Andrea Guarracino, Silvia Buonaiuto, Leonardo Gomes de Lima, Tamara Potapova, Arang Rhie, Sergey Koren +117 more
2023· article· en· Nature· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
144
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gene and genome duplication
David Sankoff
2001· review· en· Current Opinion in Genetics & Development· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
143
citations
afffundunlabeled
The genome of the vervet (<i>Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus</i>)
Wesley C. Warren, Anna J. Jasinska, Raquel García-Pérez, Hannes Svardal, Chad Tomlinson, Mariano Rocchi +52 more
2015· article· en· Genome Research· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
134
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About