MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1922161996 · doi:10.1101/gr.192922.115

The genome of the vervet (<i>Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus</i>)

2015· article· en· W1922161996 on OpenAlexafffund
Wesley C. Warren, Anna J. Jasinska, Raquel García-Pérez, Hannes Svardal, Chad Tomlinson, Mariano Rocchi, Nicoletta Archidiacono, Oronzo Capozzi, Patrick Minx, Michael J. Montague, Kyung Kim, LaDeana W. Hillier, Milinn Kremitzki, Tina Graves, Colby Chiang, Jennifer F. Hughes, Nam K. Tran, Yu Huang, Vasily Ramensky, Oi‐Wa Choi, Yoon J. Jung, Christopher A. Schmitt, Nikoleta Juretic, Jessica Wasserscheid, Trudy R. Turner, Roger W. Wiseman, Jennifer J. Tuscher, Julie A. Karl, Jörn E. Schmitz, Roland Zahn, David H. O’Connor, Eugene Redmond, Alex Nisbett, Béatrice Jacquelin, Michaela Müller‐Trutwin, Jason M. Brenchley, Michel Dione, Martín Antonio, Gary P. Schroth, Jay R. Kaplan, Matthew J. Jorgensen, Gregg W.C. Thomas, Matthew W. Hahn, Brian J. Raney, Bronwen Aken, Rishi Nag, Juergen Schmitz, Gennady Churakov, Angela Noll, Roscoe Stanyon, David Webb, Françoise Thibaud‐Nissen, Magnus Nordborg, Tomàs Marquès‐Bonet, Ken Dewar, George M. Weinstock, Richard K. Wilson, Nelson B. Freimer

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome Centre
FundersCHIST-ERANational Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of HealthGenome CanadaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaAgence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites ViralesWellcome TrustNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory
KeywordsVervet monkeyBiologyGenomeCercopithecus aethiopsAfrican Green MonkeyGeneticsZoologyVirologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a genome reference of the African green monkey or vervet (Chlorocebus aethiops). This member of the Old World monkey (OWM) superfamily is uniquely valuable for genetic investigations of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), for which it is the most abundant natural host species, and of a wide range of health-related phenotypes assessed in Caribbean vervets (C. a. sabaeus), whose numbers have expanded dramatically since Europeans introduced small numbers of their ancestors from West Africa during the colonial era. We use the reference to characterize the genomic relationship between vervets and other primates, the intra-generic phylogeny of vervet subspecies, and genome-wide structural variations of a pedigreed C. a. sabaeus population. Through comparative analyses with human and rhesus macaque, we characterize at high resolution the unique chromosomal fission events that differentiate the vervets and their close relatives from most other catarrhine primates, in whom karyotype is highly conserved. We also provide a summary of transposable elements and contrast these with the rhesus macaque and human. Analysis of sequenced genomes representing each of the main vervet subspecies supports previously hypothesized relationships between these populations, which range across most of sub-Saharan Africa, while uncovering high levels of genetic diversity within each. Sequence-based analyses of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) polymorphisms reveal extremely low diversity in Caribbean C. a. sabaeus vervets, compared to vervets from putatively ancestral West African regions. In the C. a. sabaeus research population, we discover the first structural variations that are, in some cases, predicted to have a deleterious effect; future studies will determine the phenotypic impact of these variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome ResearchSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207