MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,194 results · 1 filter active ·
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,194 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,194 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,194 of 1,194 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
P <scp>aparazzi</scp>
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
62
citations
afffundunlabeled
Double bubbles sans toil and trouble
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
61
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thin skin elastodynamics
2013· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
affunlabeled
FrankenGAN
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
Shape‐simplifying Image Abstraction
2008· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
54
citations
affunlabeled
Energy-Brushes
2016· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The Cluster Hair Model
2000· article· en· Graphical Models· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
afffundunlabeled
Modeling lobed leaves
2004· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
Stippling by example
2009· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
Isophote distance
2007· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
afffundunlabeled
Feature-aligned shape texturing
2009· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
TriWild
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
48
citations
affunlabeled
StrokeAggregator
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About