MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,177 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,177 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,177 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,177 of 1,177 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
The Planning Fallacy
Roger Buehler, Dale Griffin, Johanna Peetz
2010· book-chapter· en· Advances in experimental social psychology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
affunlabeled
The globalizability of temporal discounting
Kai Ruggeri, Amma Panin, Milica Vdović, Bojana Većkalov, Nazeer Abdul-Salaam, Jascha Achterberg +165 more
2022· article· en· Nature Human Behaviour· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Positive mood effects on delay discounting.
Jacob B. Hirsh, Alex Guindon, Dominique Morisano, Jordan B. Peterson
2010· article· en· Emotion· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
afffundunlabeled
This is Your Portfolio on Winter
Lisa A. Kramer, Jochen Weber
2011· article· en· Social Psychological and Personality Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
95
citations
affunlabeled
Physical Contact and Financial Risk Taking
Jonathan Levav, Jennifer Argo
2010· article· en· Psychological Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
93
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Updating Preferences with Multiple Priors
Eran Hanany, Peter Klibanoff
2006· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Analytic thinking: do you feel like it?
Valerie Thompson, Kinga Morsanyi
2012· article· en· Mind & Society· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
91
citations
affunlabeled
A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion
Yoram Halevy, Vincent Feltkamp
2005· article· en· The Review of Economic Studies· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
84
citations
affunlabeled
The Common Currency of Psychological Distance
Sam J. Maglio, Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman
2013· article· en· Current Directions in Psychological Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
affunlabeled
Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate
Nick Chater, Teppo Felin, David C. Funder, Gerd Gigerenzer, Jan J. Koenderink, Joachim I. Krueger +6 more
2017· article· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
79
citations
afffundunlabeled
Priming memories of past wins induces risk seeking.
Elliot A. Ludvig, Christopher R. Madan, Marcia L. Spetch
2014· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology General· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
A signal detection analysis of contingency data
Lorraine G. Allan, Shepard Siegel, Jason M. Tangen
2005· article· en· Learning & Behavior· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
affunlabeled
Uncertain deduction and conditional reasoning
Jonathan St. B. T. Evans, Valerie A. Thompson, David E. Over
2015· article· en· Frontiers in Psychology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
76
citations
affunlabeled
Risk aversion and framing effects
Louis Lévy‐Garboua, Hela Maafi, David Masclet, Antoine Terracol
2011· article· en· Experimental Economics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity
Michael Hoy, Richard Peter, Andreas Richter
2014· article· en· Journal of Risk and Uncertainty· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
68
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About