MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

933 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
933 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 19

Labels cover 5 of 933 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 933 of 933 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Genetically modified poplars in context
Steven H. Strauss, Stephen DiFazio, Richard Meilan
2001· article· en· The Forestry Chronicle· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Food security and the evaluation of risk
Stuart J. Smyth, Peter W.B. Phillips, William A. Kerr
2014· article· en· Global Food Security· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
afffundunlabeled
Pollen-mediated gene flow in wild oat
Bruce G. Murray, Ian N. Morrison, Lyle F. Friesen
2002· article· en· Weed Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance
Timothy Caulfield, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Yann Joly, Robert Cook‐Deegan
2013· article· en· Genome Medicine· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
46
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The politics of Golden Rice
Adrian Dubock
2014· article· en· GM crops & food· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
42
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Genetically modified plants as fish feed ingredients
Nini H. Sissener, Monica Sanden, Åshild Krogdahl, Anne-Marie Bakke, Lene E. Johannessen, Gro‐Ingunn Hemre
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Science diplomacy for plant health
Baldissera Giovani, Sylvia Blümel, Ralf Lopian, D.A.J. Teulon, Stephanie Bloem, Cristina Galeano Martínez +33 more
2020· article· en· Nature Plants· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About