MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

609 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
609 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 13

Labels cover 0 of 609 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 609 of 609 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Signals and systems.
Nevan J. Krogan, Timothy R. Hughes
2006· article· en· Genome Biology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Software agents and wireless E-commerce
Zakaria Maamar, Hamdi Yahyaoui, Wathiq Mansoor, Willem-Jan vd Heuvel
2001· article· en· ACM SIGecom Exchanges· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Geographic server distribution model for key revocation
Sudip Misra, Sumit Goswami, Gyan Prakash Pathak, Nirav R. Shah, Isaac Woungang
2010· article· en· Telecommunication Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Distributed and mobile spatial computing
Patrick Laube, Matt Duckham, Arie Croitoru
2009· article· en· Computers Environment and Urban Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affunlabeled
Scalable multi-agent systems
Ralph Deters
2001· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Implementation and Application of Automata
Kai Salomaa, Yo-Sub Han
2016· book· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Inter-agent Communication in IMAGO Prolog
Xining Li, Guillaume Autran
2005· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Multi-Directional Search
Dor Atzmon, Jiaoyang Li, Ariel Felner, Eliran Nachmani, Shahaf Shperberg, Nathan Sturtevant +1 more
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About