MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,307 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,307 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 27

Labels cover 2 of 1,307 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,307 of 1,307 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Formalism and functionalism in linguistics
Frederick J. Newmeyer
2010· editorial· en· Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
affunlabeled
Ergative to accusative
Alana Johns
2001· book-chapter· en· Studies in language companion series· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
affunlabeled
Syntax within the Word
Daniel Siddiqi
2009· book· en· Linguistik aktuell· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Nuuchahnulth (Nootka) morphosyntax
俊秀 中山
2001· book· en· University of California Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
affunlabeled
The balance between syntax and discourse in Old English
Ans van Kemenade, Tanja Milićev, R. Harald Baayen
2008· book-chapter· en· Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series 4, Current issues in linguistic theory· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
59
citations
affunlabeled
The loss of affixation in Cham
Marc Brunelle
2020· book-chapter· en· Typological studies in language· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
MOOD SELECTION IN RELATIVE CLAUSES
Claudia Borgonovo, Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, Philippe Prévost
2014· article· en· Studies in Second Language Acquisition· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Rhizomatic Relations of A/r/tography
Rita L. Irwin, Ruth Beer, Stephanie Springgay, Kit Grauer, Gu Xiong, Barbara Bickel
2008· book-chapter· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
TESTING THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS
Hyang Suk Song, Bonnie D. Schwartz
2009· article· en· Studies in Second Language Acquisition· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
On<i>Wh</i>-questions in Persian
Arsalan Kahnemuyipour
2001· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Semantics of Nominal Exclamatives
Paul Pörtner, Raffaella Zanuttini
2005· book-chapter· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
Split Ergativity is not about Ergativity
Jessica Coon, Omer Preminger
2017· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
57
citations
affunlabeled
The grammar of ‘non-realization’
Tania Kuteva, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova, Anvita Abbi
2019· article· en· Studies in Language· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A familiar definite article in Akan
Ruby Arkoh, Lisa Matthewson
2012· article· en· Lingua· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
54
citations
affunlabeled
Imperfective aspect and epistemic modality
Ronny Boogaart, Radoslava Trnavac
2011· book-chapter· en· Human cognitive processing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Dislocation focus construction in Chinese
Lawrence Y. L. Cheung
2009· article· en· Journal of East Asian Linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
Choice Between the Overt and the Covert
Liejiong Xu
2003· article· en· Transactions of the Philological Society· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
Complex verb formation revisited
Christine M. Pittman
2009· book-chapter· en· Typological studies in language· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
affunlabeled
Prosodic Focus
Michael Wagner
2020· other· en· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
affunlabeled
On the Meaning of Only
Michela Ippolito
2007· article· en· Journal of Semantics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
affunlabeled
The Generative Word
Hagit Borer
2017· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Type Grammars as Pregroups
Joachim Lambek
2001· article· en· Grammars· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
Feature Gluttony
Jessica Coon, Stefan Keine
2020· article· en· Linguistic Inquiry· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
Ellipsis in appositives
Dennis Ott
2016· article· en· Glossa a journal of general linguistics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affunlabeled
On the Universality of Syntactic Categories
Hamida Demirdache, Lisa Matthewson
2020· preprint· en· Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Imperatives and evidentiality in Innu
Anne‐Marie Baraby
2017· book-chapter· en· Studies in language companion series· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Future temporal reference in French: An introduction
Philip Comeau, Anne-José Villeneuve
2016· article· fr· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Control and Thematic Agreement
Jila Ghomeshi
2001· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About