MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

723 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
723 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 15

Labels cover 71 of 723 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 723 of 723 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Futures of Scholarly Publishing
Cathy N. Davidson
2004· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
11
citations
venueno affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Letter to the Editors
Panagiotis Tsigaris
2019· letter· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
11
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
Open Access in China: A Study of Social Science Journals
Fei Guo, Jing-Yuan Xue, Ruoxi Li
2014· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
11
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+research_integritygpt · scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy
Dan Harms
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Why Copy Editors Matter
Sylvia Izzo Hunter
2004· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books, 2012–14
Albert N. Greco, Alana M. Spendley
2016· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Peer Review: Fetishes, Fallacies, and Perceptions
Robin Derricourt
2011· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
9
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Scholarly Journal Publishing in Malaysia
Merina Hew
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · no categorymodels split
Writing a Series of Best-Selling Research Reference Books
Yan Piaw Chua
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communication+open_sciencegpt · scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Open Publication, Digital Abundance, and Scarce Labour
Martin Paul Eve
2017· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books, 1989-2000
Albert N. Greco, Walter F. O'Connor, Sharon P. Smith, Robert M. Wharton
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Reviewing Reviewing
David Henige
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
8
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About