MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,661 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,661 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 32 of 54

Labels cover 6 of 2,661 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,661 of 2,661 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The promise of dog cloning
Hyun Ju Oh, Kihae Ra, Min Jung Kim, Geon A Kim, Erif Maha Nugraha Setyawan, Seok Hee Lee +1 more
2017· review· en· Reproduction Fertility and Development· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Transcriptomics of bovine sperm and oocytes
Vanmathy Kasimanickam, John P. Kastelic, R. Kasimanickam
2024· review· en· Animal Reproduction Science· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Screening for Oocyte Competence
Marc‐André Sirard, Mourad Assidi
2013· other· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Trade-offs in cancer and reproduction
Roger G. Gosden
2001· review· en· Human Reproduction Update· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Cancer and fertility management: <scp>FIGO</scp> best practice advice
Nikhil Purandare, Francisco Ruiloba, Long Nguyen‐Hoang, Sarikapan Wilailak, Nozomu Yanaihara, Jacqueline Pui Wah Chung +21 more
2025· article· en· International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Automated robotic vitrification of embryos
Jun Liu, Chaoyang Shi, Jun Wen, Derek G. Pyne, Haijiao Liu, Changhai Ru +1 more
2015· article· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cryopreservation of oocytes
Ri‐Cheng Chian
2010· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Theriogenology Question of the Month
Igancio Raggio, Réjean Lefebvre, Denis Vaillancourt
2005· article· en· Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About