MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199103697 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab234

234 HORMONAL FOLLICLE STIMULATION IN HOLSTEIN COWS FOR IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING SPERM SORTED BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

2015· article· en· W2199103697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. Ferré, Y. S. Bogliotti, James Chitwood, Michael E. Kjelland, Pablo J. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseEmbryo transferAndrologyBiologySpermFollicleStimulationEmbryoOocyteHormoneInternal medicineAnimal scienceEndocrinologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transvaginal ultrasound needle-guided ovum pick-up (OPU) and in vitro embryo production (IVP) offer a reliable alternative to conventional embryo transfer to produce offspring. The success of OPU/IVP greatly depends on the number and quality of retrieved oocytes. The aim of this study was to compare OPU/IVP performance from stimulated Holstein cows. Holstein (Bos taurus) >8-year-old pluriparous open dry cows (n = 28) were used for OPU as oocyte donors. Follicular waves in all groups were synchronized by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), prostaglandin F2a (PGF), and CIDR administrated on Day 0, followed by stimulation treatments 48 h later. No pre-synch was used. Total hormone dosage were administrated as follows: Group 1: pFSH = 180 mg (Folltropin, Bioniche, Belleville, ON, Canada; n = 7), Group 2: pFSH/LH = 500 IU (Pluset, Calier, Barcelona, Spain; n = 7), Group 3: eCG = 1500 IU (eCG, Biogénesis-Bagó, Buenos Aires, Argentina; n = 7) and Group 4: Control (n = 7), no stimulation. All injections were performed intramuscularly (i.m.) twice a day, during three days. OPU was performed 48 (Group 1) or 24 h (Group 2 and 3) after the last injection. The control group received saline solution i.m. Follicles were classified according to diameter in 4 categories: small (2–5 mm); medium (6–9 mm); large (10–14 mm) and extra large (>15 mm). A Mindray DP-30 Vet (Mindray Medical, Shenzhen, China) was equipped with a micro-convex transducer 5.0- to 8.5-MHz probe along with a disposable 21G needle. The OPU flow rate was 15 mL min–1. Retrieved oocytes were classified according to IETS guidelines as viable (grade 1 + 2) and non-viable (grade 3 + 4). The IVP protocol was according to that in Reprod. Fertil. Devel. (2004, 16, 253). Fertilization (Day 0) was carried out using female sex-sorted semen selected with a discontinuous density gradient (PureSperm, Nidacon, Mölndal, Sweden) and diluted to 1 × 106 sperm mL–1. ANOVA was used for comparisons of mean values and a chi-squared test was used for proportions. Results are presented in the Table 1. In conclusion, pFSH stimulation before ovum pick-up in Holstein cows increased the number of collected and viable oocytes, cleavage, embryo development, and hatching rates in comparison to other follicle stimulation hormones and non-stimulation. A cost-benefit analysis of these methods could be valuable in order to inform whether or not a stimulation protocol is necessary for a commercial IVP operation. Table 1. Numbers of follicles, collected and viable oocytes, cleavage rate, blastocysts and hatching rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207