MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199103697 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab234

234 HORMONAL FOLLICLE STIMULATION IN HOLSTEIN COWS FOR IN VITRO EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING SPERM SORTED BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

2015· article· en· W2199103697 on OpenAlex
L. Ferré, Y. S. Bogliotti, James Chitwood, Michael E. Kjelland, Pablo J. Ross

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFollicular phaseEmbryo transferAndrologyBiologySpermFollicleStimulationEmbryoOocyteHormoneInternal medicineAnimal scienceEndocrinologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transvaginal ultrasound needle-guided ovum pick-up (OPU) and in vitro embryo production (IVP) offer a reliable alternative to conventional embryo transfer to produce offspring. The success of OPU/IVP greatly depends on the number and quality of retrieved oocytes. The aim of this study was to compare OPU/IVP performance from stimulated Holstein cows. Holstein (Bos taurus) >8-year-old pluriparous open dry cows (n = 28) were used for OPU as oocyte donors. Follicular waves in all groups were synchronized by gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), prostaglandin F2a (PGF), and CIDR administrated on Day 0, followed by stimulation treatments 48 h later. No pre-synch was used. Total hormone dosage were administrated as follows: Group 1: pFSH = 180 mg (Folltropin, Bioniche, Belleville, ON, Canada; n = 7), Group 2: pFSH/LH = 500 IU (Pluset, Calier, Barcelona, Spain; n = 7), Group 3: eCG = 1500 IU (eCG, Biogénesis-Bagó, Buenos Aires, Argentina; n = 7) and Group 4: Control (n = 7), no stimulation. All injections were performed intramuscularly (i.m.) twice a day, during three days. OPU was performed 48 (Group 1) or 24 h (Group 2 and 3) after the last injection. The control group received saline solution i.m. Follicles were classified according to diameter in 4 categories: small (2–5 mm); medium (6–9 mm); large (10–14 mm) and extra large (>15 mm). A Mindray DP-30 Vet (Mindray Medical, Shenzhen, China) was equipped with a micro-convex transducer 5.0- to 8.5-MHz probe along with a disposable 21G needle. The OPU flow rate was 15 mL min–1. Retrieved oocytes were classified according to IETS guidelines as viable (grade 1 + 2) and non-viable (grade 3 + 4). The IVP protocol was according to that in Reprod. Fertil. Devel. (2004, 16, 253). Fertilization (Day 0) was carried out using female sex-sorted semen selected with a discontinuous density gradient (PureSperm, Nidacon, Mölndal, Sweden) and diluted to 1 × 106 sperm mL–1. ANOVA was used for comparisons of mean values and a chi-squared test was used for proportions. Results are presented in the Table 1. In conclusion, pFSH stimulation before ovum pick-up in Holstein cows increased the number of collected and viable oocytes, cleavage, embryo development, and hatching rates in comparison to other follicle stimulation hormones and non-stimulation. A cost-benefit analysis of these methods could be valuable in order to inform whether or not a stimulation protocol is necessary for a commercial IVP operation. Table 1. Numbers of follicles, collected and viable oocytes, cleavage rate, blastocysts and hatching rate

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it