MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,961 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,961 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 39 of 40

Labels cover 2 of 1,961 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,961 of 1,961 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Comparison limits in change detection
Jason Rajsic, Diane Wilson
2013· article· en· Journal of Vision· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Temporal processing of facial expressions of mental states
Gunnar Schmidtmann, Joshua T. Loong, Claus‐Christian Carbon, Maiya Jordan, Andrew Logan, Ian Gold
2019· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Face Puzzle Study 3 Preregistration
2022· other· en· Open Science Framework· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Ladysmith Daily Ledger
2017· article· en· Open Collections· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Attending to faces and bodies in person perception
Anna K. Lawrance, Nicholas J Argument, Katelyn Forner, Eric Y. Mah, James W. Tanaka
2025· article· en· Attention Perception & Psychophysics· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Attention to direct gaze in young and older adulthood
Kate T. McKay, Julie D. Henry, Olivia P. Demichelis, Reese K Marinic, Nathan J. Evans, Sarah A. Grainger
2025· article· en· Consciousness and Cognition· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About