MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Human Motion and Animation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

523 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
523 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 11

Labels cover 0 of 523 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 523 of 523 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Learning to Get Up
Tianxin Tao, Matthew Wilson, Ruiyu Gou, Michiel van de Panne
2022· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
AdaptiBrush
Enrique Rosales, Chrystiano Araújo, Jafet Rodríguez, Nicholas Vining, Dongwook Yoon, Alla Sheffer
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Hierarchical Planning and Control for Box Loco-Manipulation
Zhaoming Xie, Jonathan Tseng, Sebastian Starke, Michiel van de Panne, C. Karen Liu
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Physics-based Motion Retargeting from Sparse Inputs
Daniele Reda, Jungdam Won, Yuting Ye, Michiel van de Panne, Alexander Winkler
2023· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Walk the Walk, Talk the Talk
Hélène Day Fraser, Sidney Fels, Robert Pritchard
2008· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Velocity Skinning for Real‐time Stylized Skeletal Animation
Damien Rohmer, Marco Tarini, Niranjan Kalyanasundaram, Faezeh Moshfeghifar, Marie‐Paule Cani, Victor Zordan
2021· article· en· Computer Graphics Forum· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
ActionPlot
Kristin Carlson, Thecla Schiphorst, Chris Shaw
2011· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Perceptual Effects of Inconsistency in Human Animations
Sophie Kenny, Naureen Mahmood, Claire Honda, Michael J. Black, Nikolaus F. Troje
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Applied Perception· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Electronic Visualisation and the Arts (EVA 2018) - Index
Jonathan P. Bowen, Jonathan Weinel, Graham Diprose, Nick Lambert
2018· article· en· Electronic workshops in computing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
12
citations
affunlabeled
Perceptual validity in animation of human motion
S. Ali Etemad, Ali Arya, Avi Parush, Steve DiPaola
2015· article· en· Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Efficient Query Processing in 3D Motion Capture Gesture Databases
Christian Beecks, Marwan Hassani, Bela Brenger, Jennifer Hinnell, Daniel Schüller, Irene Mittelberg +1 more
2016· article· en· International Journal of Semantic Computing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Charisma
Abdennour El Rhalibi, Chris Carter, Simon B. Cooper, Madjid Merabti, Marc Price
2010· article· en· Computers in entertainment· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Motion doodles
Matthew Thorne, David Burke, Michiel van de Panne
2007· article· nl· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
MoComp
Carl Malmström, Yaying Zhang, Philippe Pasquier, Thecla Schiphorst, Lyn Bartram
2016· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About