MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Predatory publications in evidence syntheses
Amanda Ross‐White, Christina Godfrey, Kim Sears, Rosemary Wilson
2019· article· en· Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
82
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Equity and Excellence in Research Funding
Diana Hicks, J. Sylvan Katz
2011· article· en· Minerva· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
79
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Open Access Advantage
Günther Eysenbach
2006· editorial· en· Journal of Medical Internet Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
77
citations
affunlabeled
Who Discovered the Expanding Universe?
Helge Kragh, Robert W. Smith
2003· article· en· History of Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
75
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Panagiotis Tsigaris, Aceil Al‐Khatib
2019· article· en· The Journal of Academic Librarianship· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integrityconsensus · none
75
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
How is research blogged? A content analysis approach
Hadas Shema, Judit Bar‐Ilan, Mike Thelwall
2014· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
71
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study
Brett D. Thombs, A.H. Levis, Ilya Razykov, Achyuth Syamchandra, Albert F.G. Leentjens, James L. Levenson +1 more
2014· article· en· Journal of Psychosomatic Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
69
citations
affunlabeled
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery‐Gomm, Chi‐Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash
2020· article· en· Research Integrity and Peer Review· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · metaresearch
69
citations
afffundno abstractgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams
Elise Smith, Bryn Williams–Jones, Zubin Master, Vincent Larivière, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Adèle Paul‐Hus +4 more
2019· article· en· Science and Engineering Ethics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
67
citations
affunlabeled
Introduction altmetrics: What, why and where?
Heather Piwowar
2013· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
66
citations
affunlabeled
Can I afford to publish? A dilemma for African scholars
Addisu Mekonnen, Colleen T. Downs, Edu O. Effiom, Mohamed Kibaja, Michael J. Lawes, Patrick A. Omeja +5 more
2021· article· en· Ecology Letters· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
64
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access
Li Zhang, Erin Watson
2017· article· en· The Journal of Academic Librarianship· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+open_scienceconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
Authorship Proliferation in the Orthopaedic Literature
Mark Camp, Benjamin G. Escott
2013· article· en· Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometrics+research_integrityconsensus · none
64
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About