MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,980 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,980 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 43 of 60

Labels cover 8 of 2,980 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,980 of 2,980 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Three — Critique of OHS in Canada
Bob Barnetson
2010· book-chapter· en· Athabasca University Press eBooks· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Healthy, Resilient Cities
Evelyne de Leeuw, Geoff Green
2025· book-chapter· en· CABI climate change series.· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
List of Contributors
2014· other· en· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s1544-8800(09)70016-8
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The missing third in rural health research?
Timothy Skinner, Lauren A. Booker, Brad Hodge
2023· editorial· en· Australian Journal of Rural Health· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
May Hope Bloom and Grow
Elizabeth A. Ayello, R. Gary Sibbald
2021· article· en· Advances in Skin & Wound Care· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0029-7437(08)70273-8
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Editorial Comment
Bimal Bhindi, Christopher J.D. Wallis
2018· editorial· es· The Journal of Urology· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Gesundheitliche Auswirkungen von Waldbränden
Thomas Münzel, Andreas Daiber
2025· review· de· DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About