MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 44 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Surface geometry of 5D black holes and black rings
Valeri P. Frolov, Rituparno Goswami
2007· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Circuit Complexity in Z2 EEFT
Kiran Adhikari, Sayantan Choudhury, Sourabh Kumar, Saptarshi Mandal, Nilesh Pandey, Abhishek Roy +3 more
2022· article· en· Symmetry· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Light-ray wave functions and integrability
Alexandre Homrich, David Simmons–Duffin, Pedro Vieira
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
D3-D7 holographic dual of a perturbed 3D CFT
Hamid Omid, Gordon W. Semenoff
2013· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Einstein’s equations in matter
Pavel Kovtun, Ashish Shukla
2020· article· de· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Electric hyperscaling violating solutions in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>corrections
D. O’Keeffe, Amanda W. Peet
2014· article· lv· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Positivity bounds in vector theories
Claudia de Rham, Laura Engelbrecht, Lavinia Heisenberg, Alice Lüscher
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Of bounces, branes and bounds
A. J. M. Medved
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Supersymmetric Galilean Electrodynamics
Stefano Baiguera, Lorenzo Cederle, Silvia Penati
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Twisted holography
Kevin J. Costello, Davide Gaiotto
2025· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Protected states in AdS <sub>3</sub> backgrounds from integrability
Suvajit Majumder, Olof Ohlsson Sax, Bogdan Stefański, Алессандро Торриелли
2021· article· en· Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Extremal higher spin black holes
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Twisted holography of defect fusions
Jihwan Oh, Yehao Zhou
2021· article· en· SciPost Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
The type N Karlhede bound is sharp
Robert Milson, Nicos Pelavas
2012· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Giant gravitons in twisted holography
Kasia Budzik, Davide Gaiotto
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Vortex Hair on ADS Black Holes
Ruth Gregory, Peter Gustainis, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann, D. WILLS
2014· article· en· Durham Research Online (Durham University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Atiyah-Hitchin space in five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory
A. M. Ghezelbash
2009· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Quiver Symmetries and Wall-Crossing Invariance
Fabrizio Del Monte, Pietro Longhi
2022· article· en· Communications in Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
On Local Calabi-Yau Supermanifolds and Their Mirrors
R. Ahl Laamara, A. Belhaj, L.B. Drissi, E H Saidi
2006· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About