MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,679 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,679 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 49 of 54

Labels cover 60 of 2,679 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,679 of 2,679 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
The view from the Rock
W. Kondro
2010· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Write Time
Glennis Zilm
2002· article· en· Nursing leadership· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Evidence-Based Psychiatry: Response
M Dongier, Alain Lesage, Fréderic Grünberg, Émmanuel Stip
2002· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Expert and the Novice: A Tale of Two Authors
Lanette Siragusa, Kim Litwack, Daniel D. Moos
2012· article· en· Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editorial
Ian McMillan, Paula Roberts
2002· editorial· es· Nurse Researcher· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Other
Maryse Savoie, Sandra May
2004· article· en· Journal of Pain· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Searching for the evidence: The process involved
Ellen Crumley, Terry P. Klassen
2002· article· en· Paediatrics & Child Health· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Unprepared
Mikhail C.S.S. Higgins, Radiology resident
2013· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Learning from peers and patients
Jill Thistlethwaite
2015· editorial· en· The Clinical Teacher· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Tools for Evidence-Based Practice
Linda Tickle‐Degnen
2001· article· en· American Journal of Occupational Therapy· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About