MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Hernia repair and management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

550 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
550 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 11

Labels cover 1 of 550 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 550 of 550 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0246-0424(22)43306-1
M. Beck, J.-F. Gillion, M. Soler
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Raising the quality of hernia care: Is there a need?
Adrian E. Park, H. Reza Zahiri, Carla M. Pugh, Melina C. Vassiliou, Guy Voeller
2015· article· en· Surgical Endoscopy· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Imaging of the Inguinal Canal in Children
Zachary C. Williamson, Mónica Epelman, Alan Daneman, Teresa Victoria, Nancy A. Chauvin, Kamaldine Oudjhane +1 more
2013· review· en· Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Obturator hernia
Hiroaki Nakagawa, Tsukasa Asakura, Sugihiro Hamaguchi
2022· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Inguinal hernia repair: The total picture
TehemtonE Udwadia
2006· article· en· Journal of Minimal Access Surgery· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Maternal risk factors for paediatric inguinal hernia
Nathalie Auger, Francesca del Giorgio, Annie Le‐Nguyen, Marianne Bilodeau‐Bertrand, Nelson Piché
2021· article· en· British journal of surgery· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Understanding How Experts Do It
Karan Grover, Nechama Korenblit, Archana Babu, Dina Podolsky, Alfredo M. Carbonell, Sean B. Orenstein +5 more
2022· article· en· Annals of Surgery· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Inguinal hernia
R.M. Preshaw
2015· letter· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About