Surgical treatment of a canal of Nuck cyst presenting as a femoral hernia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: A canal of Nuck cyst forms because of a patent peritoneal fold evaginating through the inguinal canal in a female patient. It is a rare diagnosis because the canal often obliterates within the first year of a female patient's life. A persistent canal of Nuck may cause indirect inguinal hernias, or form hydroceles, termed canal of Nuck cysts. Here we report the first case of a canal of Nuck cyst discovered to be evaginating through the femoral canal. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old female patient initially presented with a symptomatic groin mass, and a suspected inguinal hernia on pre-operative ultrasound. Intraoperatively, she was found to have a canal of Nuck cyst terminating within the femoral canal. This was successfully repaired using a modified McVay approach, and approximation of the internal inguinal ring. She performed well post-operatively with no signs of recurrence at her six-month follow-up. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report serves to highlight the canal of Nuck cyst, a rare embryologic remnant, and the first literature-reported femoral canal of Nuck cyst. We re-affirm the diagnostic unreliability of ultrasound imaging in the workup of groin hernias. Furthermore, we describe surgical techniques to repair a canal of Nuck cyst found within the femoral canal. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, no prior literature reports a canal of Nuck cyst presenting as a femoral hernia. This rare diagnosis may be encountered in common operations and is amenable to definitive repair using traditional hernia repair techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".