MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

920 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
920 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 19

Labels cover 20 of 920 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 920 of 920 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books, 1989-2000
Albert N. Greco, Walter F. O'Connor, Sharon P. Smith, Robert M. Wharton
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
affvenueunlabeled
COLLABORATIVE DIGITAL DESIGN NOTEBOOKS
Ralph O. Buchal
2018· article· en· Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Annotation Recommendation for Online Reading Activities
Miao-Han Chang, Maiga Chang, Rita Kuo, Fathi Essalmi, Vive Kumar, Hsu-Yang Kung
2018· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in educational technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Special Collections in a Digital Age
Margaret Haines, Wayne Jones
2015· article· en· New Review of Academic Librarianship· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Paper Cuts Don't Hurt at the Gerstein Library
Heather Cunningham, Elah Feder, Isaac Muise
2010· article· en· Computers in libraries· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Just in Time vs. Just in Case
Louis Houle, Chris Beckett, Chuck Costakos
2003· article· en· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Carnegie Libraries in Alberta
Shona Gourlay
2019· article· en· Alberta History· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Providing Access to e-Journals
Lisa O’Hara
2007· article· en· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
ARL Statistics 2020
Anam Mian, Gary Roebuck
2022· book· en· ARL statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Beyond Google: What Next for Publishing?
Kate Wittenberg
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
ARL Statistics 2012–2013
2014· book· en· ARL statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Electronic publishing trends in Singapore.
Poh Choo. Heng
2001· dissertation· en· DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Our Friends Are Killing Us
Lorraine Busby
2011· article· en· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About