MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

684 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
684 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 14

Labels cover 0 of 684 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 684 of 684 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Models for Populations with Spatial Structure
Fred Brauer, Carlos Castillo‐Chávez
2011· book-chapter· en· Texts in applied mathematics· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Population, projections and rural heath
David Perkins
2014· editorial· en· Australian Journal of Rural Health· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutno abstractunlabeled
Comparative Demography of Canada and Australia
Roderic Beaujot, Peter McDonald
2016· article· en· Canadian Studies in Population· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Changing Time Representation in Microsimulation Models
Eric Wong, Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai, Joanna E. M. Sale, Andrea C. Tricco, Sharon E. Straus, David Naimark
2025· article· en· Medical Decision Making· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
UK Economy Forecast
Ray Barrell, Simon Kirby, Rebecca Riley
2006· article· en· National Institute Economic Review· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s0967-0653(97)88925-9
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Project Canada 1980-95 Panel Study
2020· article· en· OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About