MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 61 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Singular supersymmetric σ-models
Tino S. Nyawelo, Fabio Riccioni, J.W. van Holten, Stefan Groot Nibbelink
2003· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
PROBING UNIVERSALITY IN AdS/CFT
Adam Ritz
2010· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Large Strebel Graphs and (3,2) Liouville CFT
Séverin Charbonnier, Bertrand Eynard, François David
2018· article· en· Annales Henri Poincaré· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Weak solutions in Einstein theory and beyond
Francesco Fazzini, Hassan Mehmood
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Non-extremal near-horizon geometries
Andrea Fontanella
2023· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Dark baryon black holes
Stefano Profumo
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Rotating restricted Schur polynomials
Nicholas Bornman, Robert de Mello Koch, Laila Tribelhorn
2017· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY FROM QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
Wenxi Chen
2012· article· en· International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Into the bulk: Reconstructing spacetime from the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:math>matrix model
Joanna L. Karczmarek, Daoyan Wang
2010· article· lv· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
AdS/CFT and the geometry of an energy gap
Andrew Hickling, Toby Wiseman
2016· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Complexity Equals Anything
Alexandre Belin, Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan, Gábor Sárosi, Antony J. Speranza
2021· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Odd Wilson surfaces
Olga Chekeres, Vladimir Salnikov
2024· article· en· Journal of Geometry and Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Supersymmetry on AdS3 and AdS4
2003· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About