MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 62 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
de Sitter State in Heterotic String Theory
Stephon Alexander, Keshav Dasgupta, Archana Maji, Pichai Ramadevi, Radu Tătar
2024· article· en· Fortschritte der Physik· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum deformation of cubic string field theory
Arshid Shabir, Amaan A. Khan, James Q. Quach, Salman Sajad Wani, Mir Faizal, Seemin Rubab
2024· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Rényi second laws for black holes
Alice Bernamonti, Federico Galli, Robert C. Myers, Ignacio A. Reyes
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Complexity Equals (Almost) Anything
Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan
2025· book-chapter· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Tunneling in Horava–Lifshitz black hole
J. Sadeghi, A. Banijamali, E. Reisi
2013· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quantum mechanics of the interior of radiating 2D black holes
J. Gegenberg, G. Kunstatter, Tim Taves
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Deep in the knotted black hole
Massimiliano Spadafora, Manar Naeem, María Rosa Preciado-Rivas, Robert B. Mann, Jorma Louko
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Looking at bulk points in general geometries
Simon Caron-Huot, Joydeep Chakravarty, Keivan Namjou
2025· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Condensation phenomena in gravity
2020· article· en· Modern Physics Letters A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Homotopy classes of gauge fields and the lattice
Claudio Meneses, José A. Zapata
2019· article· en· Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Erratum to: Quantum tasks in holography
Alex May
2020· erratum· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Brane holes
Valeri P. Frolov, Shinji Mukohyama
2011· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Master equations for de Sitter DFPs
Alex Buchel
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Ghosts from ghosts in the BRST formalism
D. G. C. McKeon
2015· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic black hole cosmologies
Abhisek Sahu, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2025· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Distorted static black holes with a bubble
Matin Tavayef, Shohreh Abdolrahimi, Ivan Booth, Hari K. Kunduri
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About