MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,624 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,624 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 63 of 73

Labels cover 2 of 3,624 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,624 of 3,624 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Krysten Rutherford
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on essd-2023-468
Siv K. Lauvset, Nico Lange, Toste Tanhua, Henry C. Bittig, Are Olsen, Alex Kozyr +18 more
2024· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
<i>L&amp;O</i> Papers Attracting Attention
K. David Hambright
2025· article· en· Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometrics+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Arnaud Laurent
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Flora Mazoyer
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2023-2851
2024· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on CC1
Flora Mazoyer
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on bg-2023-153
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2023-1764
Elizabeth D. Swanner, Chris Harding, Sajjad Akam, Ioan Lascu, Gabrielle Ledesma, Pratik Poudel +8 more
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on AC2
Emmanuel Devred
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC1
James R. Christian
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Comment on os-2021-21
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC2
James R. Christian
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC3
James R. Christian
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on bg-2021-38
Roxane Tzortzis, Andrea M. Doglioli, Anne Petrenko, Francesco d’Ovidio, Lloyd Izard, Mélilotus Thyssen +5 more
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Owen A. Sherwood
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2022-852
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comment on bg-2022-152
Arnaud Laurent, Haiyan Zhang, Katja Fennel
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comment on bg-2021-45
Owen A. Sherwood, Samuel H. Davin, Nadine Lehmann, Carolyn Buchwald, Evan Edinger, Moritz F. Lehmann +1 more
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Owen A. Sherwood
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Comment on egusphere-2023-987
Krysten Rutherford, Katja Fennel, Lina Garcia Suarez, Jasmin G. John
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Philippe Massicotte
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Tereza Jarníková
2022· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Comment on gmd-2021-327
Anh T. Pham
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Reply on RC1
Emmanuel Devred
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Comment on bg-2021-55
Emmanuel Devred, Andrea Hilborn, Cornelia E. den Heyer
2021· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comment on bg-2023-46
Robert Izett, Katja Fennel, Adam C. Stoer, David Nicholson
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Reply on RC2
Robert Izett
2023· peer-review· en· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About