MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,177 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,177 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 24

Labels cover 1 of 1,177 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,177 of 1,177 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Reasoning and Problem Solving
Jacqueline P. Leighton, Robert J. Sternberg
2003· other· en· Handbook of Psychology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning
Henry Markovits, Pier‐Luc de Chantal, Janie Brisson, Éloise Dubé, Valerie Thompson, Ian R. Newman
2020· article· en· Memory & Cognition· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affunlabeled
EXTERNAL NORMS AND RATIONALITY OF CHOICE
Walter Bossert, Kotaro Suzumura
2009· article· en· Economics and Philosophy· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Initial examination of priming tasks to decrease delay discounting
Christine E. Sheffer, James MacKillop, Arislenia Fernandez, Darren R. Christensen, Warren K. Bickel, Matthew W. Johnson +5 more
2016· article· en· Behavioural Processes· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affunlabeled
Perceiving Threat
Janice Gross Stein
2023· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Expected multi-utility representations
Tsogbadral Galaabaatar, Edi Karni
2012· article· en· Mathematical Social Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About