MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

920 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
920 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 19

Labels cover 20 of 920 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 920 of 920 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Out of the Stack and into the Net
Gaynor Austen, Carolyn D. Young
2005· article· en· The Reference Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Documenting electronic heterogenous literature
Lescouet Emmanuelle, Marcello Vitali-Rosati
2022· article· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Implications of Electronic Journals for Information Institutions
Abdus Sattar Chaudry, Zhihong Wang
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Toward information equity among academic libraries
Chad Currier
2022· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The Elsevier-WebLUIS Connection
Michele Newberry, Elaine Henjum, Carol A. Drum, Beth Guay
2000· article· fr· The Serials Librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Wiley (John) & Sons Inc.
2004· article· en· Mergent s Dividend Achievers· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
Moving From Paper to E-Book Reading
Joan Vinall-Cox
2012· article· en· eLearn· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Wiley (John) & Sons Inc.
2007· article· en· Mergent s Dividend Achievers· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Weeding the Web
Michael W.L. Chee
2020· article· en· Emerging Library & Information Perspectives· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueno abstractunlabeled
Why libraries aren't dead: open access and the evolving liaison role
Shannon Gordon
2011· article· en· Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Interlibrary Loan Policies
David Schoen, Leslie R. Morris
2008· article· en· Journal of Interlibrary Loan & Information Supply· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Electronic Ready Reference Resources
Barbara Kern
2000· article· en· Internet Reference Services Quarterly· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Why the Bath Profile Makes Z39.50 Work
Peter Gethin
2001· article· en· LIBER Quarterly The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Last call for print journals
Barbara Sibbald
2003· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · no categorymodels split
Driven by Demand: Public Library Perspectives on the Elending Market
Jenny Kennedy, Rebecca Giblin, Kimberlee Weatherall, Julian Thomas
2020· article· en· Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
What about the Collection
Sharon Coatney
2004· article· en· Teacher librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The Active e-Reader
Katy Campbell
2004· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About