MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

This cohort has 4,299,418 works, more than the 100,000-row export cap: the file will contain the first 100,000 ordered by OpenAlex id, and says so in its last line. Narrow the cohort, page the API, or rebuild the frame from the repository for the rest. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,299,418 results · 0 filters active
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,299,418 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 718 of 85,989

Labels cover 11,048 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,299,418 of 4,299,418 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
<i>Planck</i>intermediate results
P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio‐Barandela, J. Aumont +206 more
2012· article· en· Astronomy and Astrophysics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
337
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Machine learning: supervised methods
Danilo Bzdok, Martin Krzywinski, Naomi Altman
2018· article· en· Nature Methods· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
337
citations
afffundunlabeled
Topologically adaptable snakes
Tim McInerney, Demetri Terzopoulos
2002· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
337
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Physical and chemical aeronomy of HD 209458b
A. García Muñoz
2007· article· en· Planetary and Space Science· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
336
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Good disclosure, bad disclosure
Itay Goldstein, Liyan Yang
2018· article· en· Journal of Financial Economics· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
336
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Motor mechanisms of balance during quiet standing
David A. Winter, Aftab E. Patla, Milad G. Ishac, William H. Gage
2002· article· en· Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
336
citations
afffundunlabeled
Comparative hydrolysis of P2 receptor agonists by NTPDases 1, 2, 3 and 8
Filip Kukulski, Sébastien A. Lévesque, Élise G. Lavoie, Joanna Lecka, François Bigonnesse, Aileen F. Knowles +3 more
2005· article· en· Purinergic Signalling· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
336
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Dioxins: WHO’s tolerable daily intake (TDI) revisited
F.X.R. van Leeuwen, Mark Feeley, Dieter Schrenk, John Christian Larsen, William H. Farland, Maged Younes
2000· article· en· Chemosphere· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
336
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About