MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. A/Physical review, A
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

699 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
699 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 14

Labels cover 2 of 699 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 699 of 699 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Cold-resonance-mediated self-stabilization of Kerr frequency combs in a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> microring resonator
Sauradeep Kar, Maitrayee Saha, Saawan Kumar Bag, Rajat Kumar Sinha, Shubhanshi Sharma, Sridhar Singhal +1 more
2022· article· lv· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
Optically defined mechanical geometry
Abeer Z. Barasheed, Tina Müller, Jack C. Sankey
2016· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Theory for the Rydberg states of helium: Comparison with experiment for the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mn>24</mml:mn> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:none/> <mml:mprescripts/> <mml:none/> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> state ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>24</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> )
Aaron Bondy, G. W. F. Drake, Cody McLeod, Evan M. R. Petrimoulx, Xiao-Qiu Qi, Zhen-Xiang Zhong
2025· article· lv· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Perturbative model of noisy quantum signal processing
Andrew K. Tan, Yuan Liu, Minh C. Tran, Isaac L. Chuang
2023· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Graph-state representation of the toric code
Pengcheng Liao, David L. Feder
2021· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
High-contrast interaction-free quantum imaging method
Sepideh Ahmadi, Erhan Sağlamyürek, Shabir Barzanjeh, Vahid Salari
2023· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
Random coding for sharing bosonic quantum secrets
Francesco Arzani, Giulia Ferrini, Frédéric Grosshans, Damian Markham
2019· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
afffundunlabeled
Entanglement generation via diffraction
Aaron Z. Goldberg, Daniel F. V. James
2019· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Families of quantum fingerprinting protocols
Benjamin Lovitz, Norbert Lütkenhaus
2018· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Intensity<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>correlations in random fiber lasers: A random-matrix-theory approach
Ernesto P. Raposo, Iván R. R. González, Edwin D. Coronel, A. M. S. Macêdo, Leonardo de S. Menezes, Raman Kashyap +2 more
2022· article· lv· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
7
citations
afffundunlabeled
Entanglement depth for symmetric states
Ji-Yao Chen, Zhengfeng Ji, Nengkun Yu, Bei Zeng
2016· article· en· Physical review. A/Physical review, A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About