MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

479 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
479 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 10

Labels cover 3 of 479 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 479 of 479 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Listening to faculty
Beverlie Dietze, Audrey J. Penner, Susan Ashley, Kim Gillis, Holly Moses, Brenda Goodine
2014· article· en· Transformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Internationally Renowned Speakers on Campus
Mike Doyle
2006· article· en· ResearchOnline - ND (The University of Notre Dame Australia)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Right of children to be heard
Donna Koller
2023· preprint· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Words Matter
Melanie Boyd, Jennifer Lee, Rhiannon Jones, Diane Lorenzetti
2024· article· en· Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
What my Professors Didn't Tell Me
John R. Taylor
2001· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plastic Surgery· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
University Governance and Campus Speech
Wayne Sumner
2020· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Reflections on the speakership
Peter Milliken
2011· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
For a More Playful Communication Studies
2022· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Comal Springs at Landa Park
2016· other· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Vaughan, P. (ed.). (1976). Learning to Listen .
G. R. Yewchuk
2012· article· en· Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Choice of Listening
Linda Martin
2013· article· en· Canadian women's studies· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About