MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,034 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,034 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 41

Labels cover 13 of 2,034 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,034 of 2,034 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Computation at the Cutting Edge of Science
Sergey V. Kovalchuk, Clélia de Mulatier, Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya, Jiří Mikyška, Maciej Paszyński, Jack Dongarra +1 more
2024· article· en· Journal of Computational Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Transactions on Computational Science VII
Marina L. Gavrilova
2010· book· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Using Workflows to Automate Activities in MDE Tools
Miguel Andrés Gamboa, Eugene Syriani
2017· book-chapter· en· Communications in computer and information science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Object-Oriented Metrics
L. A. Abelson
2002· report· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Digital provenance
Greg Bak
2024· article· en· Archival Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Making Provenance Work for You
Barbara Lerner, Emery R. Boose, Orenna Brand, Aaron M. Ellison, Elizabeth Fong, Matthew K. Lau +6 more
2023· article· en· The R Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Scaling Trends for Data Poisoning in LLMs
Dillon Bowen, Brendan Murphy, Will Cai, David Khachaturov, Adam Gleave, Kellin Pelrine
2025· article· en· Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
UPBEAT: Test Input Checks of Q# Quantum Libraries
Tianmin Hu, Guixin Ye, Zhanyong Tang, Shin Hwei Tan, Huanting Wang, Meng Li +1 more
2024· article· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Getting Back to "The Very Idea"
Ronald J. Brachman
2005· article· en· AI Magazine· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Characterizing Python Library Migrations
Mohayeminul Islam, Ajay Kumar Jha, Ildar Akhmetov, Sarah Nadi
2024· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
HRI 2018 Workshop
Ross Mead, Daniel H. Grollman, Angelica Lim, Cynthia Yeung, Andrew Stout, W. Brad Knox
2018· article· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About