MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

6,765 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
6,765 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 99 of 136

Labels cover 2 of 6,765 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 6,765 of 6,765 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A new look at magnetic white dwarfs
François Hardy, P. Dufour, S. Jordan
2019· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Recent developments with the visible nulling coronagraph
Brian Hicks, Richard G. Lyon, Matthew R. Bolcar, Mark Clampin, Peter Petrone, Michael A. Helmbrecht +2 more
2016· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
SCExAO: First Results and On-Sky Performance
Thayne Currie, Olivier Guyon, Frantz Martinache, Christophe Clergeon, Michael W. McElwain, C. Thalmann +3 more
2013· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
Galactic echoes
Rimpei Chiba, Jupiter Ding, Chris Hamilton, Matthew W. Kunz, Scott Tremaine
2025· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Planet candidates from the SARG visual binary survey
Elena Carolo, S. Desidera, R. Gratton, A. Martinez Fiorenzano, Michael Endl, R. Cosentino +5 more
2010· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey
C. J. Evans, N. Bastian, J. M. Bestenlehner, J. van Loon
2020· article· en· elib (German Aerospace Center)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
REFINED PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE HD327083 BINARY SYSTEM
A. S. Nodyarov, А. С. Мирошниченко, Serik A. Khokhlov, S. V. Zharikov, N. Manset, I.A. Usenko
2022· article· en· Odessa Astronomical Publications· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About