MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,842 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,842 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 37

Labels cover 6 of 1,842 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,842 of 1,842 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Dieter Klemm, Friederike Krämer, Sebastian Moritz, Tom Lindström, Mikael Ankerfors, Derek G. Gray +1 more
2011· review· en· Angewandte Chemie International Edition· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4,369
citations
affunlabeled
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
E. Johan Foster, Robert J. Moon, Umesh P. Agarwal, Michael J. Bortner, Julien Bras, Sandra Camarero‐Espinosa +19 more
2018· review· en· Chemical Society Reviews· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1,007
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications
Tíffany Abitbol, Amit Rivkin, Yifeng Cao, Yuval Nevo, Eldho Abraham, Tal Ben‐Shalom +2 more
2016· review· en· Current Opinion in Biotechnology· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
986
citations
afffundunlabeled
Cellulose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
Ryan J. Hickey, Andrew E. Pelling
2019· review· en· Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
470
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose
Zhe Ling, Tuo Wang, Mohamadamin Makarem, Michael Santiago Cintrón, H. N. Cheng, Xue Kang +10 more
2019· article· en· Cellulose· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
397
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Dispersion Properties of Nanocellulose: A Review
Youlu Chu, Yan Sun, Weibing Wu, Huining Xiao
2020· review· en· Carbohydrate Polymers· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
296
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Application of Cellulose Microfibrils in Polymer Nanocomposites
William J. Orts, Justin Shey, Syed H. Imam, Gregory M. Glenn, Mara Guttman, Jean‐François Revol
2005· article· en· Journal of environmental polymer degradation· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
293
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About