MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2111885708 · doi:10.1139/v07-152

Polysaccharide nano crystal reinforced nanocomposites

2008· article· en· W2111885708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhiskersWhiskerNano-CelluloseChemical engineeringAqueous solutionCrystal (programming language)ChemistryNanocompositeMaterials scienceComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are numerous examples of animals or plants that synthesize extracellular high-performance skeletal biocomposites consisting of a matrix reinforced by nano sized crystalline domains. Cellulose and chitin are classical examples of these reinforcing elements, which occur as whisker-like microfibrils that are biosynthesized and deposited in a continuous fashion. In many cases, this mode of biogenesis leads to crystalline microfibrils that are almost defect-free, and whose axial physical properties therefore approach those of perfect crystals. During the last decade we have attempted to mimic biocomposites by blending cellulose or chitin whiskers from different sources with polymer matrices. Aqueous suspensions of such nano crystals can be prepared by acid hydrolysis of the substrate. The object of this treatment is to dissolve away regions of low lateral order so that the water-insoluble, highly crystalline residue may be converted into a stable suspensoid by subsequent vigorous mechanical shearing action. The resulting nano crystals occur as rod-like particles or whiskers, whose dimensions depend on the nature of the substrate. They are typically a few hundred nm long and between 5 and 20 nm in diameter. Starch can also be used as a source for the production of nano crystals. The constitutive nano crystals appear as platelet-like nano particles with a length ranging between 20 and 40 nm, a width ranging between 15 and 30 nm, and a thickness ranging between 5 and 7 nm. Since the first announcement of using cellulose whiskers as a reinforcing phase, they have been used extensively as model fillers in several kinds of polymeric matrices, including synthetic and natural ones. Casting mixtures of polysaccharide nano crystals and lattices led to the production of nano composite materials with drastically enhanced mechanical properties, especially at T > T g of the matrix, by virtue of the formation of a whiskers network, even when the whisker volume fraction was only a few percent. The formation of this rigid network, resulting from strong interactions between whiskers, was assumed to be governed by a percolation mechanism. This hydrogen-bonded network induced a thermal stabilization of the composite up to 500 K, the temperature at which polysaccharides start to decompose. Any factors that perturb the formation of this percolating network directly affect the reinforcing effect of polysaccharide nano crystals. In addition to some practical applications, the study of these nano composite materials can help researchers understand such physical properties as the geometric and mechanical percolation effect.Key words: nano composites, polysaccharide, polymer, cellulose, nano crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it