MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

282 results · 1 filter active ·
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
282 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 6

Labels cover 0 of 282 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 282 of 282 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
High dynamic range display systems
2004· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
551
citations
affunlabeled
Layered 3D
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
162
citations
affunlabeled
Roadmap on holography
2020· article· en· Journal of Optics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
111
citations
affunlabeled
Polarization fields
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
110
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Eyeglasses-free display
2014· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
84
citations
afffundunlabeled
Hologram stability evaluation for Microsoft HoloLens
2017· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
81
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Focus 3D
2013· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
75
citations
affunlabeled
Angular Talbot effect
2014· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
65
citations
affunlabeled
Coded aperture projection
2010· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
affunlabeled
Improving the visual comfort of stereoscopic images
2003· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
36
citations
affunlabeled
Mix-and-match holography
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
New Techniques in Digital Holography
2015· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Engineering
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
17
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About