MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
School Choice and Performance
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

795 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
795 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 16

Labels cover 3 of 795 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 795 of 795 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Class Size and Student Achievement
Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Dominic J. Brewer, Adam Gamoran, J. Douglas Willms
2001· article· en· Gothic.net· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
384
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy
Guanglei Hong, Stephen W. Raudenbush
2006· article· en· Journal of the American Statistical Association· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
377
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Does Management Matter in schools?
Nicholas Bloom, Renata Lemos, Raffaella Sadun, John Van Reenen
2015· article· en· The Economic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
289
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Peer Effects in Drug Use and Sex Among College Students
Greg J. Duncan, Johanne Boisjoly, Michael Kremer, Dan Levy, Jacque Eccles
2005· article· en· Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
237
citations
afffundunlabeled
Leaving Boys Behind
Nicole M. Fortin, Philip Oreopoulos, Shelley Phipps
2015· article· en· The Journal of Human Resources· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
190
citations
affunlabeled
A SIGNALING THEORY OF GRADE INFLATION*
William Chan, Hao Li, Wing Suen
2007· article· en· International Economic Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Grading Standards and Education Quality
Raphael Boleslavsky, Christopher Cotton
2015· article· en· American Economic Journal Microeconomics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Behavioral Economics of Education
Adam Lavecchia, H. Liu, Philip Oreopoulos
2016· book-chapter· en· Handbook of the economics of education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
86
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About