MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

673 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
673 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 14

Labels cover 0 of 673 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 673 of 673 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
VTR 7.0
Jason Luu, Jeffrey Goeders, Michael Wainberg, Andrew Somerville, Thien Yu, Konstantin Nasartschuk +8 more
2014· article· en· ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
362
citations
afffundunlabeled
VTR 8
Kevin E. Murray, Oleg Petelin, Sheng Zhong, Jia Min Wang, Mohamed Eldafrawy, Jean-Philippe Legault +9 more
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
293
citations
affunlabeled
Timing-driven placement for FPGAs
Alexander Marquardt, Vaughn Betz, Jonathan Rose
2000· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
284
citations
affunlabeled
Packing Steiner trees
Kamal Jain, Mohammad Mahdian, Mohammad R. Salavatipour
2003· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
204
citations
afffundunlabeled
Accelerating Benders Decomposition by Local Branching
Walter Rei, Jean‐François Cordeau, Michel Gendreau, Patrick Soriano
2008· article· en· INFORMS journal on computing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
164
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Multi-threaded Graph Partitioning
Dominique LaSalle, George Karypis
2013· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
152
citations
afffundunlabeled
Timing-Driven Titan
Kevin E. Murray, Scott Whitty, Suya Liu, Jason Luu, Vaughn Betz
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
98
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Leopard
Jiewen Huang, Daniel J. Abadi
2016· article· en· Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
93
citations
affunlabeled
Using sparse crossbars within LUT
Guy Lemieux, David Lewis
2001· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
72
citations
affunlabeled
On the interaction between power-aware FPGA CAD Algorithms
Julien Lamoureux, Steven J. E. Wilton
2003· article· en· ICCAD-2003. International Conference on Computer Aided Design (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37486)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
71
citations
affunlabeled
VPR 5.0
Jason Luu, Ian Kuon, Peter Jamieson, Ted Campbell, Andy Ye, Wei Mark Fang +2 more
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
70
citations
affunlabeled
COFFE 2
Sadegh Yazdanshenas, Vaughn Betz
2019· article· en· ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
62
citations
affunlabeled
GPlace3.0
Ziad Abuowaimer, Dani Maarouf, Timothy J. Martin, Jeremy Foxcroft, Gary Gréwal, Shawki Areibi +1 more
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
60
citations
affunlabeled
Towards scalable placement for FPGAs
Huimin Bian, Andrew C. Ling, Alexander Choong, Jianwen Zhu
2010· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Timing-driven routing for symmetrical array-based FPGAs
Yao‐Wen Chang, Kai Zhu, Martin D. F. Wong
2000· article· en· ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
46
citations
affunlabeled
TAPHS
Zhenyu Gu, Yonghong Yang, Jia Wang, Robert P. Dick, Li Shang
2006· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
45
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About