MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

36 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20172025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
36 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 36 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 36 of 36 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Password Life Cycle
Elizabeth Stobert, Robert Biddle
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
affunlabeled
<i>FOSSIL</i>
Saed Alrabaee, Paria Shirani, Lingyu Wang, Mourad Debbabi
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
52
citations
afffundunlabeled
SoK: Human-centered Phishing Susceptibility
Sijie Zhuo, Robert Biddle, Yun Sing Koh, Danielle Lottridge, Giovanni Russello
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
afffundunlabeled
Technological and Human Factors of Malware Attacks
Fanny Lalonde Lévesque, Sonia Chiasson, Anil Somayaji, José M. Fernandez
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
ISOTOP
Taous Madi, Yosr Jarraya, Amir Alimohammadifar, Suryadipta Majumdar, Yushun Wang, Makan Pourzandi +2 more
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
What is Beautiful is Secure
Milica Stojmenović, Eric Spero, Miloš Stojmenović, Robert Biddle
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
Computation on Encrypted Data Using Dataflow Authentication
Andreas Fischer, Benny Fuhry, Jörn Kußmaul, Jonas Janneck, Florian Kerschbaum, Eric Bodden
2022· article· en· ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About