MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Argumentation
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

44 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
44 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 44 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 44 of 44 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument
Leo Groarke
2002· article· en· Argumentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
afffundunlabeled
Annotating Argument Schemes
Jacky Visser, John Lawrence, Chris Reed, Jean H. M. Wagemans, Douglas Walton
2020· article· en· Argumentation· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Evaluating Corroborative Evidence
Douglas Walton, Chris Reed
2008· article· en· Argumentation· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Emotional Messages
Michael A. Gilbert
2001· article· en· Argumentation· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Critical Inquiry: Considering the Context
Mark Battersby, Sharon Bailin
2011· article· en· Argumentation· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Slippery Slopes and Collapsing Taboos
John Woods
2000· article· en· Argumentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Case-to-Case Arguments
Katharina Stevens
2018· article· da· Argumentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Teaching the Fallacies
J. Anthony Blair
2023· article· en· Argumentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Textbook Treatments of Fallacies
David Hitchcock
2023· article· en· Argumentation· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Book Review
Robert C. Pinto
2007· article· en· Argumentation· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Antoine Arnauld (1612--1694)
John Woods
2000· article· en· Argumentation· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)
Hans V. Hansen
2024· article· en· Argumentation· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About