MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Optical Fiber Communication Conference
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

143 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20042018
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
143 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 143 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 143 of 143 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Electrical Domain Compensation of Optical Dispersion
John McNicol, Maurice O’Sullivan, Kim Roberts, A. Comeau, D. McGhan, L. Strawczynski
2005· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affunlabeled
Integrated Optical Beamformers
Chris Roeloffzen, Ruud Oldenbeuving, Roelof Bernardus Timens, Paul van Dijk, Caterina Taddei, Arne Leinse +5 more
2015· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affunlabeled
ROADM Subsystems & Technologies
B.P. Keyworth
2005· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Security of Quantum Key Distribution
Normand J. Beaudry, Agnes Ferenczi, Varun Narasimhachar, Tobias Moroder, Xiongfeng Ma, Marco Piani +1 more
2010· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
Next Generation Transmission Fiber for Coherent Systems
Rong Chen, Maurice O’Sullivan, Charles Ward, Serge Asselin, Michel Bélanger
2010· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
High-Speed Heterogeneous InP-on-Si Capacitive Phase Modulators
Sylvie Menezo, Torrey Thiessen, Philippe Grosse, Joyce K. S. Poon, Christophe Jany, Jérémy Da Fonseca +8 more
2018· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
Ultra-narrow linewidth quantum dot coherent comb lasers
Zhenguo Lü, J.R. Liu, Philip J. Poole, Chunying Song, Shoude Chang
2018· article· en· Optical Fiber Communication Conference· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About