MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

15 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20082025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
15 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 15 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 15 of 15 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Case 3709 – Conservation of the usage of names of western North American Hesperia comma-group subspecies (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae) through designation of neotypes for Pamphila colorado Scudder, 1874, Pamphila manitoba Scudder, 1874, Pamphila cabelus Edwards, 1881, Pamphila harpalus Edwards, 1881, P
Norbert G. Kondla, John F. Emmel, Kenneth E. Davenport, Sterling O. Mattoon, Michael Fisher, Crispin S. Guppy +5 more
2018· article· en· The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+stsconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Case 3746 — Ripiphoridae Laporte, 1840 and Ripiphorus Bosc, 1791 (Insecta, Coleoptera): proposed conservation of usage by designating Ripiphorus subdipterus Fabricius, 1792 as the type species of Ripiphorus and proposed ruling that Laporte (1840) used the type genus Ripiphorus in the sense defined b
Yves Bousquet, Patrice Bouchard
2018· article· en· The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
COMMENTS
K. G. A. Hamilton
2014· article· en· The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Articles
David L. Hawksworth, Werner Greuter, Joost A. Stalpers, Vincent Robert, Gerrit Stegehuis, P.W. Crous +4 more
2009· article· en· The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About