MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Written Language & Literacy
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

22 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20012023
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
22 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 22 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 22 of 22 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Learning to read in English as third language
Mila Schwartz, Esther Geva, David L. Share, Mark Leikin
2007· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Interactive reading
Hélène Makdissi, Andrée Boisclair
2006· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affunlabeled
Phat Lines
Warren Olivo
2001· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affunlabeled
The relation between spelling and pronunciation
Catherine Brissaud, Carole Fisher, Isabelle Négro
2012· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Preserving Canada’s ‘<i>honour</i>’
Kevin Heffernan, Alison J. Borden, Alexandra C. Erath, Julie-Lynn Yang
2010· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations
affunlabeled
STRESYL
Simone Sulpizio, Giacomo Spinelli, Cristina Burani
2017· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
More matters of typology
Arvind Iyengar
2023· article· en· Written Language & Literacy· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About