Walter A. Rodney: A promise of revolution by Clairmont Chung (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Walter A. Rodney: A promise of revolution by Clairmont Chung Michael O. West Walter A. Rodney: A promise of revolution Edited by Clairmont Chung. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2012. Walter Rodney was born in 1942 in colonial Guyana (then called British Guiana) and died in 1980 in postcolonial Guyana, almost certainly assassinated by the government of Guyana. In a short thirty-eight years, Rodney lived an amazing life, becoming at once a renowned scholar and a brave political activist. After finishing high school in Guyana, Rodney attended the Jamaica campus of the University of the West Indies (UWI). He subsequently obtained a Ph.D. in African history from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London. He then taught briefly at the University of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, before returning to UWI as a lecturer. His second Jamaican sojourn was short, much shorter than anticipated. By now, 1968, the Black Power movement, like the revolution of 1968 to which it was related, had gone global. No sooner had Rodney returned to Jamaica than he became the leading voice of Black Power on the island. On the strength of this reputation, he was invited to the seminal global Black Power gathering of the year, the Congress of Black Writers, held in Montreal, Canada, in October 1968. On returning to Jamaica from the Congress, Rodney was denied reentry. The Jamaican government, which shared with other neocolonial regimes in the Caribbean a common paranoia about Black Power, banned Rodney as an undesirable alien, which sparked a rebellion by urban youths, for whom Rodney was the beloved “Bredda Wally.” Rodney then returned to the University of Dar es Salaam, where he wrote the book for which he is best known, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa (1972). Finally, in 1974, Rodney returned home to assume a post at the University of Guyana. It was not to be. The Guyanese government, which had quietly applauded his expulsion from Jamaica six years earlier, revoked the appointment. Instead of seeking work abroad, however, Rodney opted to remain in Guyana. Soon, he became a leading light in the Working People’s Alliance (WPA), which had one overriding aim: to heal the ethnic breach between Guyanese of Indian (South Asian) and African descent, especially the workers of both groups. In so doing, the WPA differed sharply from the two existing political parties, each dominated by members of the Indian and African middle classes with an investment in divisive ethnic politics. Forbes Burnham, the African-descended president who had been in power since independence in 1966, repeatedly threatened the WPA and Rodney personally. Burnham apparently made good on that threat on 13 June 1980, when a bomb disguised as a walkie-talkie exploded and killed Rodney. Clairmont Chung’s slim edited volume, Walter A. Rodney: A promise of revolution, mainly explores Rodney’s WPA years through reminiscences by Rodney’s political and intellectual coworkers, in and out of Guyana. A Guyanese, Chung previously made a documentary film on Rodney. (Full disclosure: this reviewer was interviewed for the film.) The volume under review consists of some of the interviews from that film. The volume has no single theme, or set of related themes. However, there are certain recurring issues, some of which shed light on Rodney as an individual. We learn that he was sociable, that he was funny and that he was a dancer. Rodney was athletic, too, and had a keen interest in cricket, although he never wrote about it. He was also an earnest card player, one interviewee reporting that he had “never known a more dogmatic bridge player than Walter Rodney” (117). Other interviewees mention Rodney’s legendary debating skills, which he first honed in high school. Another prominent theme is Rodney’s closeness to students. It was university students who first protested his expulsion from Jamaica, before being superseded by the urban youths, who spearheaded the so-called Rodney Riot. In the Preface to his magnum opus, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Rodney generically thanks “many colleagues and comrades” for their input. Significantly, however, the only two individuals he mentions by name (Karim Hirji and Henry Mapolu) were students, as one contributor...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».