MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1045233509

Special Foreword: We Are the Manifestations of Our Ancestor S Prayers

2012· article· en· W1045233509 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terry L. Cross, Cindy Blackstock

Notice bibliographique

RevueChild welfare · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismOppressionDignityPolitical sciencePower (physics)Government (linguistics)SociologyCorporate governanceEconomic JusticeEconomic growthEnvironmental ethicsLawPolitical economyPoliticsBusiness
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Colonialism infuses the experience of First Peoples around the world, across the past, present, and future continuum. Its destructive force extends past First Peoples, eroding the understanding of non-Aboriginal peoples and to diminishing the fundamental national values of democracy, freedom, justice, and dignity for all, even in the most developed nations. For a colonial power to be successful, it must take the land, control the natural resources (especially food and water sources), suppress self-governance, delegitimize culture (language, spirituality, education, and so on)-and, finally, it must take the children. Every colonial power across the world has done these things, and in the process has established policies and infrastructure that have held the colonial relationship in place over time. Child welfare policy and practice has been no exception; it has just recently begun to acknowledge its colonial culture and take steps to address it in some parts of the world.The United States and Canada are seldom thought of as contemporary colonial powers-unless, of course, you are among its First Peoples. Every day, we experience the manifestations of colonialism in the form of limited jurisdiction, restraints on our right to protect our own children, disproportional placement of our children, health and social disparities, and inadequate funding provided for First Nations and tribal services. Much of this oppression is legitimized and systematized within government policies and emboldened by a lack of knowledge among non-Aboriginal peoples about the disadvantages that First Peoples continue to face simply because of who they are. Colonialism is a choice. As child welfare organizations and the public increase their awareness of colonialism and its active diminishment of First Peoples, there develops an irrevocable responsibility to stand with First Peoples to acknowledge the past, learn from it, and set a course for a relationship that is characterized by mutual respect, justice, and peace. There is a lot of strength to build on. First Peoples have successfully resisted colonialism, and although much damage has been done, there is strong resolve to prosper as distinct peoples who make important contributions to our communities and to other peoples of the world. There is also a growing number of non-Aboriginal allies who are stepping forward on both sides of the border to demand the end of inequitable government policies that erode the human rights set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment 11 on the Rights of Indigenous Children. Both of these documents affirm the rights of First Peoples to claim and control our lands and resources, and to receive proper compensation in the case of irrevocable loss, to maintain our sovereignty, to maintain our cultural ways of knowing the world-and, most importantly, to claim our right to care for our children. Some countries, like Canada, view UNDRIP as an aspirational document that is not binding; however, Canada cannot escape its responsibilities to uphold Indigenous peoples' rights because the fundamental nature of those rights is protected in numerous international human rights conventions to which Canada and other countries are legally bound. There is much current discussion on reconciliation, and some frame that within a discourse of decolonization. The problem with limiting the discussion to decolonization is that it centers on colonialism versus the pursuit of freedom and the inherent rights that are at the center of the enterprise.We propose a discourse of reconciliation based on the recognition of inherent rights and freedoms that support Indigenous peoples in the reclamation of their cultures, languages, and children in ways consistent with UNDRIP. This pursuit requires a firm rejection of the colonial versions of reality that have been perpetrated in the name of history and continue to exist in some classrooms in our countries. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,847
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChild welfareMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207