MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1045233509

Special Foreword: We Are the Manifestations of Our Ancestor S Prayers

2012· article· en· W1045233509 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Terry L. Cross, Cindy Blackstock

Bibliographic record

VenueChild welfare · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismOppressionDignityPolitical sciencePower (physics)Government (linguistics)SociologyCorporate governanceEconomic JusticeEconomic growthEnvironmental ethicsLawPolitical economyPoliticsBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colonialism infuses the experience of First Peoples around the world, across the past, present, and future continuum. Its destructive force extends past First Peoples, eroding the understanding of non-Aboriginal peoples and to diminishing the fundamental national values of democracy, freedom, justice, and dignity for all, even in the most developed nations. For a colonial power to be successful, it must take the land, control the natural resources (especially food and water sources), suppress self-governance, delegitimize culture (language, spirituality, education, and so on)-and, finally, it must take the children. Every colonial power across the world has done these things, and in the process has established policies and infrastructure that have held the colonial relationship in place over time. Child welfare policy and practice has been no exception; it has just recently begun to acknowledge its colonial culture and take steps to address it in some parts of the world.The United States and Canada are seldom thought of as contemporary colonial powers-unless, of course, you are among its First Peoples. Every day, we experience the manifestations of colonialism in the form of limited jurisdiction, restraints on our right to protect our own children, disproportional placement of our children, health and social disparities, and inadequate funding provided for First Nations and tribal services. Much of this oppression is legitimized and systematized within government policies and emboldened by a lack of knowledge among non-Aboriginal peoples about the disadvantages that First Peoples continue to face simply because of who they are. Colonialism is a choice. As child welfare organizations and the public increase their awareness of colonialism and its active diminishment of First Peoples, there develops an irrevocable responsibility to stand with First Peoples to acknowledge the past, learn from it, and set a course for a relationship that is characterized by mutual respect, justice, and peace. There is a lot of strength to build on. First Peoples have successfully resisted colonialism, and although much damage has been done, there is strong resolve to prosper as distinct peoples who make important contributions to our communities and to other peoples of the world. There is also a growing number of non-Aboriginal allies who are stepping forward on both sides of the border to demand the end of inequitable government policies that erode the human rights set out in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child General Comment 11 on the Rights of Indigenous Children. Both of these documents affirm the rights of First Peoples to claim and control our lands and resources, and to receive proper compensation in the case of irrevocable loss, to maintain our sovereignty, to maintain our cultural ways of knowing the world-and, most importantly, to claim our right to care for our children. Some countries, like Canada, view UNDRIP as an aspirational document that is not binding; however, Canada cannot escape its responsibilities to uphold Indigenous peoples' rights because the fundamental nature of those rights is protected in numerous international human rights conventions to which Canada and other countries are legally bound. There is much current discussion on reconciliation, and some frame that within a discourse of decolonization. The problem with limiting the discussion to decolonization is that it centers on colonialism versus the pursuit of freedom and the inherent rights that are at the center of the enterprise.We propose a discourse of reconciliation based on the recognition of inherent rights and freedoms that support Indigenous peoples in the reclamation of their cultures, languages, and children in ways consistent with UNDRIP. This pursuit requires a firm rejection of the colonial versions of reality that have been perpetrated in the name of history and continue to exist in some classrooms in our countries. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChild welfareSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207