Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Over the past four years I have received many letters from individuals interested in submitting an article and have also received requests for information from several Promotion and Tenure Committees regarding our process. I have responded accordingly. Teaching and Learning is a nonprofit professional publication started in 2002 by myself, then Associate Dean of the Faculty of Education and the Brock-Golden Horseshoe Education Consortium which consists of ten school boards and the faculty of education, Brock University located in the greater Niagara Region of Ontario Canada. The publication is designed primarily to enhance the professional development of teachers and others interested in education in schools and communities. The topics for each issue are determined by an executive board and are decided at an annual meeting. Each board and the faculty contribute financially to the publication. And receive 600-700 copies of each issue three times a year. Subscribers contribute to the funding as do occasional selected advertisers and sales of single and multiple copies. The publication is perhaps more of a professional periodical and newsletter than a "formal" scholarly journal (meaning "blind" reviews, although that said most articles other than interviews and solicited lead articles are vetted by selected readers). The publication combines elements of both a professional publication and a journal and attracts authors and readers from all segments including applied research. Our readership is local, national and international. Articles are received in a variety of ways. They are usually in response to a formal call for papers printed in previous issues. In addition the editor solicits articles from key professionals and from time to time interviews selected individuals who have contributed significantly to the focus of the issue. Articles are received by the editor and read for content, relevance, appropriate writing style and clarity of thought and articulate communication of what is important in terms of the professional development interests highlighted in the issue at hand. Articles are then sent to selected readers (who have volunteered to adjudicate but who wish to remain anonymous) for readability and to determine if the article would be appropriate for inclusion in Teaching and Learning. I f the article is deemed acceptable then authors are advised and the editor works with the authors and the publisher to edit the article to fit the space, style and format of the publication (81/2x11, 3 column format 32-36 pages). This is a collaborative venture that involves communicating with authors and the publisher over several draft revisions and it is one that seems to work well .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,054 | 0,204 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,062 | 0,022 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,181 | 0,361 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».