MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W115863507 · doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-4717

Biogeography, Evolution and Diversity of Free-Living Protists : Insights from Testate Amoebae

2010· article· en· W115863507 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thierry J. Heger

Notice bibliographique

RevueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueProtist diversity and phylogeny
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTestate amoebaeBiologyPolyphylyProtistEcologyBiogeographyBiodiversityEvolutionary biologySpecies complexTaxonomy (biology)Ecosystem diversityZoologyPhylogeneticsCladePhylogenetic treeGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Although widely recognized as essential actors of ecosystem processes and representing a significant part of the Earth's biodiversity, free-living protists are poorly known. Major questions concerning their diversity, ecology, and evolution remain completely unresolved, partly because our knowledge of their taxonomy, at each different levels, is still extremely limited. In this thesis, I used testate amoebae as model organisms to get insights into the diversity and biogeography of protists. Testate amoebae are a polyphyletic group of free-living protists that are characterized by a shell composed of proteinaceous, calcareous, or siliceous material. The shells are differentiated by their shapes and ultrastructures, allowing for the identification of morphospecies more easily than in the vast majority of other protists. However, the taxonomic validity of the characters used to define morphospecies and the true diversity of testate amoebae are largely unknown. We studied the taxonomy of cyphoderiid testate amoebae (Rhizaria: Euglyphida), by combining morphological and molecular genetic approaches (chapters 2 and 3). We used light- and scanning electron microscopy to analyze the shell ultrastructure and biometry of several Cyphoderia morphospecies and sequenced gene portions of the Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit 1 (COI) and nuclear small subunit rDNA (SSU). These analyses revealed that while several described species are morphologically distinct and well-supported by the genetic data, other species, such as Cyphoderia ampulla, represent a complex of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species. The presence of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic Cyphoderia species illustrates the limits of a morphology-based approach for assessing protist diversity using only characters visible by light microscopy. DNA sequence analyses may allow for a better resolution for both species identification and diversity estimates, provided that appropriate genetic markers can be developed. Genetic marker development in protists is particularly challenging because their representation in the international genomic databases is still very limited. The SSU marker also allowed us to build an extensive phylogeny of eulgyhid testate amoebae. We then used this phylogeny as a framework to analyze macro-evolutionary processes in testate amoebae, in particular, how easily a species can cross an ecological barrier and colonize new habitats. The taxa included in our phylogeny occurred either in marine, marine supralittoral or freshwater habitats, and species of each habitat segregated into distinct sub-clades. This indicates that transitions between these environments occur only rarely in the course of evolution (chapter 4). A reliable taxonomy for microorganisms is not only an essential prerequisite for estimating species diversities, it would also be a key component to resolve the long-lasting debate of whether free-living microorganisms are strictly cosmopolitan, or whether at least some species have limited geographic distributions (chapter 1). We analyzed Arcellinida and Euglyphida testate amoeba communities from Amsterdam Island, one of the most remote islands in the world located in the Indian Ocean, to search for endemic species with limited geographic distributions (chapter 5). In macroorganisms, the degree of endemism is generally high in such remote islands. Our extensive inventory of testate amoeba morphospecies provided no clear evidence for endemism. However, given that the morphology-based species identification gives only a limited taxonomic resolution, we cannot exclude the presence of morphologically non-distinctive endemic species (cryptic species). Thus, such taxonomic uncertainties undermine biogeographical studies of testate amoebae and other protists. To circumvent taxonomical uncertainties in biogeographical studies, we analyzed the distribution of a morphologically highly distinctive testate amoeba, Nebela ansata (chapter 6). We report the presence of this species in Nova Scotia, Canada and at sites in New Jersey where it was initially described. An extensive literature survey further confirmed the absence of this species from both, the remaining North American continent as well as other continents. Together, these data provide an unusually convincing case of a free-living microorganism with a very limited distribution range along the temperate East American coast. Overall, my thesis illustrates how, in most cases, the current morphology-based species identification greatly underestimates testate amoeba diversity and calls for an improvement of the taxonomic resolution and reliability. The extension of the current taxonomy using molecular-genetic tools should greatly contribute to this task and also shed light on the debate on the distribution of protists and other microorganisms. Together, such studies will provide a first step towards a better understanding of the diversity and evolution of microorganisms and improve their utility as model organisms in both fundamental and applied questions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,002

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)Même sujetProtist diversity and phylogenyTravaux en français237 207