MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W115863507 · doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-4717

Biogeography, Evolution and Diversity of Free-Living Protists : Insights from Testate Amoebae

2010· article· en· W115863507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thierry J. Heger

Bibliographic record

VenueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestate amoebaeBiologyPolyphylyProtistEcologyBiogeographyBiodiversityEvolutionary biologySpecies complexTaxonomy (biology)Ecosystem diversityZoologyPhylogeneticsCladePhylogenetic treeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although widely recognized as essential actors of ecosystem processes and representing a significant part of the Earth's biodiversity, free-living protists are poorly known. Major questions concerning their diversity, ecology, and evolution remain completely unresolved, partly because our knowledge of their taxonomy, at each different levels, is still extremely limited. In this thesis, I used testate amoebae as model organisms to get insights into the diversity and biogeography of protists. Testate amoebae are a polyphyletic group of free-living protists that are characterized by a shell composed of proteinaceous, calcareous, or siliceous material. The shells are differentiated by their shapes and ultrastructures, allowing for the identification of morphospecies more easily than in the vast majority of other protists. However, the taxonomic validity of the characters used to define morphospecies and the true diversity of testate amoebae are largely unknown. We studied the taxonomy of cyphoderiid testate amoebae (Rhizaria: Euglyphida), by combining morphological and molecular genetic approaches (chapters 2 and 3). We used light- and scanning electron microscopy to analyze the shell ultrastructure and biometry of several Cyphoderia morphospecies and sequenced gene portions of the Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit 1 (COI) and nuclear small subunit rDNA (SSU). These analyses revealed that while several described species are morphologically distinct and well-supported by the genetic data, other species, such as Cyphoderia ampulla, represent a complex of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species. The presence of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic Cyphoderia species illustrates the limits of a morphology-based approach for assessing protist diversity using only characters visible by light microscopy. DNA sequence analyses may allow for a better resolution for both species identification and diversity estimates, provided that appropriate genetic markers can be developed. Genetic marker development in protists is particularly challenging because their representation in the international genomic databases is still very limited. The SSU marker also allowed us to build an extensive phylogeny of eulgyhid testate amoebae. We then used this phylogeny as a framework to analyze macro-evolutionary processes in testate amoebae, in particular, how easily a species can cross an ecological barrier and colonize new habitats. The taxa included in our phylogeny occurred either in marine, marine supralittoral or freshwater habitats, and species of each habitat segregated into distinct sub-clades. This indicates that transitions between these environments occur only rarely in the course of evolution (chapter 4). A reliable taxonomy for microorganisms is not only an essential prerequisite for estimating species diversities, it would also be a key component to resolve the long-lasting debate of whether free-living microorganisms are strictly cosmopolitan, or whether at least some species have limited geographic distributions (chapter 1). We analyzed Arcellinida and Euglyphida testate amoeba communities from Amsterdam Island, one of the most remote islands in the world located in the Indian Ocean, to search for endemic species with limited geographic distributions (chapter 5). In macroorganisms, the degree of endemism is generally high in such remote islands. Our extensive inventory of testate amoeba morphospecies provided no clear evidence for endemism. However, given that the morphology-based species identification gives only a limited taxonomic resolution, we cannot exclude the presence of morphologically non-distinctive endemic species (cryptic species). Thus, such taxonomic uncertainties undermine biogeographical studies of testate amoebae and other protists. To circumvent taxonomical uncertainties in biogeographical studies, we analyzed the distribution of a morphologically highly distinctive testate amoeba, Nebela ansata (chapter 6). We report the presence of this species in Nova Scotia, Canada and at sites in New Jersey where it was initially described. An extensive literature survey further confirmed the absence of this species from both, the remaining North American continent as well as other continents. Together, these data provide an unusually convincing case of a free-living microorganism with a very limited distribution range along the temperate East American coast. Overall, my thesis illustrates how, in most cases, the current morphology-based species identification greatly underestimates testate amoeba diversity and calls for an improvement of the taxonomic resolution and reliability. The extension of the current taxonomy using molecular-genetic tools should greatly contribute to this task and also shed light on the debate on the distribution of protists and other microorganisms. Together, such studies will provide a first step towards a better understanding of the diversity and evolution of microorganisms and improve their utility as model organisms in both fundamental and applied questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)Same topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207