MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W116984838

Growth Weakens Worldwide

2011· article· en· W116984838 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gerhard Fenz, Josef Schreiner, Maria Antoinette Silgoner

Notice bibliographique

RevueMonetary Policy & the Economy · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)RecessionReal gross domestic productGovernment (linguistics)ChinaMonetary economicsEconomic expansionYield (engineering)International economicsMacroeconomicsGeography
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Substantial data revisions have shown that the U.S. recession in 2008 to 2009 was far more pronounced than originally estimated, and that the recovery has been slower than previously assumed. Leading indicators signal that growth will stay weak in the second half of 2011. With key interest rates already at a low level, monetary policymakers have resorted to new nonstandard measures to support the economy. Japan’s economy has largely recovered from the severe consequences of the earthquake in March 2011. The reconstruction activities have given Japan’s economy a boost, and global production chains have been largely reestablished. Japan’s economic growth is likely to enter positive territory again already in the second half of 2011. For 2011 as a whole, the IMF sees Japanese GDP declining by 0.5%. Additionally, the strong appreciation of the Japanese yen may affect export growth. While China’s economic growth has lost some steam, it will still come to some 9% in 2012. Euro area growth slackened noticeably in the course of the first half of 2011. In the second quarter, real GDP edged up by only 0.2% on the previous quarter. Consumer spending diminished, and exports became the mainstay of growth. Euro area economic growth is anticipated to stay slow in the third quarter. Conditions in the labor market have been improving only hesitantly. The continued tension in the government bond market is creating uncertainty. Whereas Ireland’s efforts to consolidate its government finances have resulted in a decline in yield spreads, the yields on Greek sovereign bonds rose to new heights in September 2011 following reports that the results of Greece’s consolidation efforts have been insufficient. In recent months uncertainties about the economic prospects in EU Member States in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE) heightened significantly. The slowdown in growth in the second quarter of 2011 and the publication of adverse economic data for both Europe as a whole and the world economy lead to activity forecasts for the region having been revised downwards since early summer 2011. Price pressures, which were comparatively high in the first six months of 2011, passed their peak in the summer. In various countries the external position has gradually deteriorated of late. Thus the crisis-induced cyclical component of current account adjustment is slowly losing significance. The Austrian economy continued to expand at a fairly robust pace in the first half of 2011 and, even at 0.7% growth in the second quarter, significantly outperformed Germany and the euro area as a whole. Meanwhile, however, there have been increasing signs of a sudden and substantive loss of economic momentum from mid-2011 onward. The weaker external environment and a high level of uncertainty in the corporate sector against the backdrop of the sovereign debt crisis have caused export and investment, previously the key growth drivers, to cool off visibly. For 2011 as a whole, GDP growth is still expected to average close to 3% given the strong start into the year. The outlook for growth in 2012, however, is rather weak, with the latest GDP growth projections, released in September 2011, lying within a range of 0.8% (Austrian Institute of Economic Research – WIFO) to 1.3% (Institute of Advanced Studies – IHS).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,808
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,208
Écart entre enseignants0,169 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMonetary Policy & the EconomyMême sujetGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesTravaux en français237 207