Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substantial data revisions have shown that the U.S. recession in 2008 to 2009 was far more pronounced than originally estimated, and that the recovery has been slower than previously assumed. Leading indicators signal that growth will stay weak in the second half of 2011. With key interest rates already at a low level, monetary policymakers have resorted to new nonstandard measures to support the economy. Japan’s economy has largely recovered from the severe consequences of the earthquake in March 2011. The reconstruction activities have given Japan’s economy a boost, and global production chains have been largely reestablished. Japan’s economic growth is likely to enter positive territory again already in the second half of 2011. For 2011 as a whole, the IMF sees Japanese GDP declining by 0.5%. Additionally, the strong appreciation of the Japanese yen may affect export growth. While China’s economic growth has lost some steam, it will still come to some 9% in 2012. Euro area growth slackened noticeably in the course of the first half of 2011. In the second quarter, real GDP edged up by only 0.2% on the previous quarter. Consumer spending diminished, and exports became the mainstay of growth. Euro area economic growth is anticipated to stay slow in the third quarter. Conditions in the labor market have been improving only hesitantly. The continued tension in the government bond market is creating uncertainty. Whereas Ireland’s efforts to consolidate its government finances have resulted in a decline in yield spreads, the yields on Greek sovereign bonds rose to new heights in September 2011 following reports that the results of Greece’s consolidation efforts have been insufficient. In recent months uncertainties about the economic prospects in EU Member States in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (CESEE) heightened significantly. The slowdown in growth in the second quarter of 2011 and the publication of adverse economic data for both Europe as a whole and the world economy lead to activity forecasts for the region having been revised downwards since early summer 2011. Price pressures, which were comparatively high in the first six months of 2011, passed their peak in the summer. In various countries the external position has gradually deteriorated of late. Thus the crisis-induced cyclical component of current account adjustment is slowly losing significance. The Austrian economy continued to expand at a fairly robust pace in the first half of 2011 and, even at 0.7% growth in the second quarter, significantly outperformed Germany and the euro area as a whole. Meanwhile, however, there have been increasing signs of a sudden and substantive loss of economic momentum from mid-2011 onward. The weaker external environment and a high level of uncertainty in the corporate sector against the backdrop of the sovereign debt crisis have caused export and investment, previously the key growth drivers, to cool off visibly. For 2011 as a whole, GDP growth is still expected to average close to 3% given the strong start into the year. The outlook for growth in 2012, however, is rather weak, with the latest GDP growth projections, released in September 2011, lying within a range of 0.8% (Austrian Institute of Economic Research – WIFO) to 1.3% (Institute of Advanced Studies – IHS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.100 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".