The attribution of profits to permanent establishments : the taxation of intra-company dealings
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PREFACE PART I THE ATTRIBUTION OF PROFITS TO PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENTS UNDER THE OECD APPROACH 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ART. 7 OF THE OECD MODEL 2.1. The 1927 and 1928 Drafts of the League of Nations 2.2. The 1933 League of Nations Draft Convention on the Allocation of Business Income 2.3. The London and Mexico Model Conventions 2.4. The 1960 OEEC Report and the 1963 OECD Draft Convention 2.5. The 1974 Proposal and the 1977 and 1992 OECD Models 2.6. The 1994 OECD Report on Attribution of Income to Permanent Establishments 2.7. The 2003 OECD Model and Commentary 2.8. The 2001 OECD Discussion Draft on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments 2.9. The 2004 OECD Discussion Draft on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments 2.9.1. Allocation of functions, risks and assets to the permanent establishment 2.9.2. Allocation of free capital to the permanent establishment 2.9.3. Attribution of profits to the permanent establishment 2.9.4. Special considerations for agency permanent establishments 3. THE TAXATION OF INTRA-COMPANY DEALINGS FOR TAX TREATY PURPOSES 3.1. The Independency fiction 3.2. The Potential Scenarios 3.2.1. In general 3.2.2. Transfer of trading stock from the general enterprise to the permanent establishment 3.2.2.1. From the perspective of the GE State 3.2.2.2. From the perspective of the PE State 3.2.3. Transfer of a capital asset from the general enterprise to the permanent establishment 3.2.3.1. From the perspective of the GE State 3.2.3.2. From the perspective of the PE State 3.2.4. Transfer of trading stock from the permanent establishment to the general enterprise 3.2.4.1. From the perspective of the GE State 2 3.2.4.2. From the perspective of the PE State 3.2.5. Transfer of a capital asset from the permanent establishment to the general enterprise 3.2.5.1. From the perspective of the GE State 3.2.5.2. From the perspective of the PE State PART II COMPARATIVE SURVEY INTRODUCTION ARGENTINA AUSTRIA BELGIUM BRAZIL CANADA CHILE FINLAND FRANCE GERMANY INDIA ITALY MEXICO NETHERLANDS SPAIN SOUTH AFRICA SWITZERLAND UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES VENEZUELA SUMMARY 3 EACH COUNTRY CHAPTER IS DIVIDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. GENERAL FEATURES OF THE TAX SYSTEM 1.1. Taxation of residents 1.2. Taxation of non-residents 2. THE TAX TREATMENT OF INTRA-COMPANY DEALINGS 2.1. In general 2.2. Transfer of Assets 2.2.1. From domestic GE to foreign PE 2.2.2. From foreign PE to domestic GE 2.2.3. From domestic PE to foreign GE 2.2.4. From foreign GE to domestic PE 2.3. Intangibles 2.3.1. From domestic GE to foreign PE 2.3.2. From foreign PE to domestic GE 2.3.3. From domestic PE to foreign GE 2.3.4. From foreign GE to domestic PE 2.4. Services 2.4.1. From domestic GE to foreign PE 2.4.2. From foreign PE to domestic GE 2.4.3. From domestic PE to foreign GE 2.4.4. From foreign GE to domestic PE 2.5. Transfer of funds 2.5.1. From domestic GE to foreign PE 2.5.2. From foreign PE to domestic GE 2.5.3. From domestic PE to foreign GE 2.5.4. From foreign GE to domestic PE Bibliography PART III SELECTED ISSUES ON THE TAX TREATMENT OF INTRA-COMPANY DEALINGS 1. Source taxation on deemed payments 2. Non-Discrimination under tax treaties 3. Non-Discrimination under EC Law
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle