MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1242362017

Chapter 1: Prologue: Before 1800

2013· article· en· W1242362017 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
James F. O'Gorman

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransactions of the American Philosophical Society · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArchitecture and Art History Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaintingEmblemVisual artsArt historyFolioProtractorArtPavilionRulerQueen (butterfly)HistoryEngineeringEngineering drawing
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EUROPEln 1772, Thomas-Germain-Joseph Duvivier of France depicted what is now the lost world of the architect in a painting housed at present in the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena, California. Le table de l'architecte contains items, clearly used, that we associate with the work of the precomputer-aided designer of buildings and other structures, especially hand-crafted drawings and draftsman's needs, such as straightedge, ink, pens, reference books, and a pair of compasses placed front and center (Figure l.l).1 Duvivier was a pupil of Jean Baptiste Simeon Chardin, whose Les attributs de l'architecte of about 1725-30, now in the Art Museum at Princeton University, also shows drawings, books, a case of drafting instruments, rule, protractor, and a pair of dividers in the lower left corner.2 Although the young architect of today would probably not recognize such obsolete tools, these instruments, as these paintings attest, once commonly functioned as extensions of the architect's hand in the drafting rooms of the Western world.5 Among the implements shown, pairs of compasses or dividers, less often a scale, a porte-crayon, or a ruler traditionally identified the sitter as an architect, although not always, as we shall see.4Now we often think of the T-square as the emblem of the past draftsman-designer, but, although used much earlier,5 the T-square did not become commonly associated with the architect until the latter part of the nineteenth century. Previous images of European or British architects most often include one or more drafting tools to signify the sitter's profession. A visual survey of the hundreds of prints created from painted portraits of Western architects found in such important collections as those at the Canadian Centre for in Montreal or in the Lawrence Hall Fowler Collection of portrait prints of architects at the Baltimore Museum of Art, demonstrates that a pair of dividers, often held by the sitter, at times shown idle on the drafting table, most frequently appear as emblems of the architect's profession. From portraits such as that by Nicolaes van Helt Stockade of the seventeenth-century Dutchman Simon Bosboom, architect, mason, and author of a work on the five orders taken from Vicenzo Scamozzi's treatise, who seems about to impale himself with his pair of dividers (Figure 1.2); through Henry Hornbostel's use of a quick-setting compass with legs spread to form the letter A for Architecture on the exterior of his College of Fine Arts at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh (1912-13); to Spiro Kostof s The Architect, published in 1977 during the advent of the computer, for which the dust jacket, designed by Egon Lauterberg, shows a pair of isolated wing dividers, this drafting tool retained its power to represent the profession.6 Often added to the display of an instrument were depictions of reference books, as in John Francis Rigaud's portrait from before 1785 of the Englishman John Yenn now at the Royal Academy of Arts in London (Figure 1. 3). Yenn holds the requisite pair of dividers with its points down on a finished drawing. Just above his right hand, the one holding the dividers, are volumes on civil architecture by William Chambers, his mentor, surmounted by an open instrument case. Above that looms a sculpture of giant acanthus leaves.7 As we shall see, the combination of instruments and books became the default position for the iconography of some architects' portraits well into the nineteenth century.We must distinguish between compasses and dividers. The former have interchangeable legs that can hold pencils, pens, charcoal, or chalk used in making lines on paper or parchment; the latter have two pointed legs not used to draw lines but to measure (often) an existing drawing, as the important nineteenth-century English architect, Practical Builder, and influential teacher of stair building, Peter Nicholson, demonstrates in his portrait by William Derby by holding a pair of dividers to a ruler, not to a sheet of drafting paper. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,489
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransactions of the American Philosophical SocietyMême sujetArchitecture and Art History StudiesTravaux en français237 207